🔍 Search
Are long-term fasts or water fasts good for you?

Are long-term fasts or water fasts good for you?

Depending on your current health, living without solid food for 24 hours or more may help you burn more fat and trigger helpful adaptations, but it may also trigger muscle loss.

Stephanie Eckelkamp
WRITTEN BY
Stephanie Eckelkamp
Dr. Rich Joseph
REVIEWED BY
Dr. Rich Joseph
UPDATED: 12/20/2024
PUBLISHED: 12/20/2024
🕗 10 MINUTE READ
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Extended fasting (24+ hours) can trigger beneficial metabolic changes like ketosis and autophagy, though most benefits aren't maintained after several months.
Research shows that about two-thirds of weight lost during long fasts comes from muscle rather than fat, causing experts like Dr. Peter Attia to reconsider their stance.
Long fasts may be beneficial for those with high body fat and insulin resistance, while leaner individuals should focus on muscle-building strategies.
Common side effects include fatigue, dizziness, and headaches, making it crucial to time fasts during low-stress periods and maintain proper hydration.
Bottom line: For most people, shorter intermittent fasting or time-restricted eating (like 14:10) offers a more sustainable approach to metabolic health.

Going for stretches without food can have real benefits. We know that fasting for at least 12 hours helps improve the body's metabolic flexibility, or the ability to effectively switch between using glucose and fat for fuel. That's one reason intermittent fasting (IF)---e.g., fasting for 16 hours and limiting your eating to an 8-hour window---has risen in popularity. 

But if short-term fasting generally has positive effects, that begs the question: Are longer fasts repeated less frequently (sometimes called periodic fasting) beneficial and safe for metabolic health? Here's what to know about water-only fasts and similar low-calorie liquid fasting approaches that last 24 hours or longer. 

Water-only fasts and other common types of longer fasts: The basics

You'll see a lot of different prolonged fasting approaches mentioned on the internet---partly because there's no set definition or parameters for the best way to do one. Often, people get their inspiration for how to take on a longer fast from dietitians, doctors, or influencers who share what works best for them---or what they think might work best based on the human and animal research to date. And to be clear, research on longer fasts in humans is quite limited, so much of what we present here is based on expert opinion.

While water-only fasts are certainly the most common and straightforward approach, they're not the only type of longer fast being promoted. Here are a few variations of the trend:

As for duration, these fasts may last anywhere from 24 hours to a week or more (sometimes up to 20 days in medically supervised settings). Some proponents recommend repeating them monthly, quarterly, or less frequently. Again, there's no official definition. Generally, though, the most commonly promoted water fasting timeframes are between one and three days. The rationale? There's no consensus, but it may take roughly this long to trigger some beneficial adaptations associated with fasting, such as ketosis and autophagy (a cellular cleanup and repair process associated with longevity). For example: 

According to longevity expert Peter Attia, MD, fasting should be done strategically (i.e., not too long, not too frequently), particularly in lean people, while fasts lasting longer than about three days may occasionally be appropriate in specific scenarios (more on that later). But regardless of the reason for the fast, intermittent fasting researcher Krista Varady, PhD, says that any fast longer than five days should not be undertaken without medical supervision. Additionally, fasting is not advised if you have a history of eating disorders; and anyone with a medical condition should get the go-ahead from their doctor before embarking on a fast.

Potential health benefits of longer fasts

As mentioned, the rationale for longer fasting periods is that they more effectively flip the "metabolic switch" from burning predominantly glucose to burning stored fat. This subsequently activates processes and metabolic pathways that aren't necessarily triggered with shorter IF approaches, such as time-restricted eating. While it's not always clear how quickly each of these benefits kicks in or how long they might last beyond the fasting period (that remains to be studied for different durations of water fasting), they're worth highlighting.

"There is no denying that some good things happen when we're not eating," writes Dr. Attia in his book Outlive. Here are a few things that might occur when fasting more than a day: 

Of course, some of these cellular changes are hard to measure directly in humans, so we have to look at clinical outcomes instead. The problem: Research on water fasting and other prolonged fasts in humans is quite limited. With that in mind, one 2023 review, led by Dr. Varady, analyzed eight small studies on water-only fasting and Buchinger fasting protocols lasting five to 20 days to summarize their metabolic effects. The researchers found that these fasts: 

However, some of these markers---fasting glucose, fasting insulin, insulin resistance, and HbA1C---improved in people without diabetes but not in those with diabetes. This result was somewhat surprising, and researchers noted that future studies should ideally track glucose using continuous glucose monitoring (rather than testing at a single point per day) to provide a more accurate picture of glycemic control. The fasts also had a mixed effect on blood lipids, with some but not all studies showing reductions in LDL and triglycerides

Interestingly, three to four months after subjects completed the fasts, they sustained none of these metabolic benefits, even if they maintained the weight loss. 

At the same time, the reviewed studies didn't examine whether any of these metabolic benefits might be maintained or enhanced if someone engaged in several longer fasts per year, as opposed to one single fast. Nor did the studies look at more reasonable fasting durations of less than five days. 

Additionally, the review combined water-only fasts and Buchinger fasts, so it's unclear how an alternative approach, like a prolonged bone broth fast (which contains protein), might influence outcomes. Some experts, like Ali Miller, RD, believe that a three- to five-day bone broth fast is an effective way to support the gut lining and quell inflammation (thanks, in part, to bone broth's high concentration of the amino acid glycine) while also supporting autophagy.

Another important finding of the review: Participants who lost weight lost about two-thirds of their weight in lean mass and one-third in fat mass---the opposite of what you want to happen. It's not surprising, though, according to Dr. Varady, because "your body needs a constant intake of protein. If it doesn't have that, then it draws from muscles." You want to hold lean muscle mass, as it's highly metabolically active, improves insulin sensitivity, reduces diabetes risk, and is even a predictor of longevity in older adults. If weight loss or weight management is your primary goal, Dr. Varady encourages a form of intermittent fasting over water fasting, as there's "a lot more data" suggesting IF can help. 

The negative impact on muscle mass is a crucial reason Dr. Attia recently changed his opinion on the utility of frequent longer-fasting protocols. On an episode of the Metabolic Optimization Podcast with Thomas DeLauer, Dr. Attia shared that while he used to regularly complete three-day water fasts once a month and up to a 10-day water fast four times a year, he no longer thinks the benefits always outweigh the risk. "I was always accumulating a bit of a debt of lost muscle mass, and over about three years, I probably lost about 10 pounds of lean mass. Today, I just don't feel the tradeoff is worthwhile, at least at that level," he said.

The bottom line: Depending on your baseline body composition, some form of prolonged fasting may or may not be worthwhile. "If you're talking about someone who has 35 percent body fat [and] insulin resistance, I think fasting's a very effective tool, and it's okay that they're going to lose a little lean mass because they're probably going to lose more fat mass along the way," Dr. Attia shared on his own podcast. (Just be sure to loop in a healthcare provider if you decide to try this.) 

For leaner people, though, your time may be better spent on muscle-building strategies. If you still want to experiment with longer fasts while limiting muscle loss, the occasional 24-hour fast is also "totally fine," according to Dr. Attia, or you can try a slightly longer fast "very intermittently---maybe once a quarter you do a fast for three days," he adds. Of course, it's hard to say what kind of results this approach might yield (we don't have any studies yet), but it does help ensure that you're periodically flipping that "metabolic switch" and possibly even enhancing longevity-supporting processes like autophagy from time to time. 

Risks of longer fasts

According to the 2023 research review, mild adverse events, including insomnia, fatigue, dizziness, dry mouth, and headaches, were frequently observed during fasts lasting five to 20 days, though these symptoms may be less intense for fasting regimens lasting less than five days. After about eight days of water fasting, levels of sodium and chloride also dipped below the acceptable range, suggesting that supplementation with these electrolytes may not be necessary if you're doing a more reasonable one- to three-day water fasting regimen. 

Remember, prolonged fasting is also a form of physiological stress. Multi-day fasting has been shown in several studies to elevate levels of the stress hormone cortisol. While some stress is good and triggers beneficial adaptations in the body, it could be a problem if you already have a high baseline stress level. 

According to Dr. Szal Gottfried, menstruating women, in particular, tend to be more prone to stress and cortisol issues, and the added stress of a fast could potentially contribute to hormonal imbalances, blood sugar spikes, and other issues. Research has also found that women experience greater self-reported hunger during a 24-hour fast compared to men, which might make it difficult to adhere to longer fasts. This makes timing a fast for periods of lower stress all the more important (more on that below).

Other things to consider before trying a longer fast

It's always good to speak with your doctor before embarking on a fasting regimen, particularly extended fasts. Generally, people with increased nutritional demands---such as children and adolescents, pregnant or breastfeeding women, and people over age 75 (who tend to need more protein and are at greater risk for muscle wasting)---should avoid fasting. Additionally, fasting is not advised for people who are underweight or have a history of eating disorders. 

Consider your overall health status, too. Fasting may not be appropriate---or may require close medical guidance or supervision---for people with certain chronic health conditions such as Type 1 diabetes. In some cases, fasting has also been shown to trigger gout attacks. And if you take any medication, ask your doctor if your dosage will need to change during your fast. For example, people on metformin who fast longer than 24 hours may need to adjust their dose. 

Practical tips to make life easier if you decide to try a longer fast

If you (and your doctor) decide a longer fast lasting roughly one to three days may be worth trying, consider these tips:

If you decide a longer fast isn't right for you, that's okay, too. You could consider a form of intermittent fasting, like time-restricted eating (TRE), which might be easier to sustain. You might start by fasting for 14 hours and limiting your eating to a 10-hour window every day (say 8 am to 6 pm). 

But keep in mind, you don't need to fast at all to be metabolically healthy---what's more important is developing long-term, sustainable habits that keep blood glucose stable, such as prioritizing nutrient-dense whole foods (including plenty of protein and healthy fats), limiting highly processed foods, and prioritizing regular physical activity.



Take control of your metabolic health

Levels help you see how food and lifestyle affect your health through macro tracking, habit-building, and customized insights and advice. Levels members can also incorporate biomarker data like real-time glucose and metabolic blood testing for an even more personalized experience.  Click here to get started with Levels.



Icon

Get updates,
new articles,
exclusive discounts,
and more

The Latest From Levels

NutritionA nutritionist explains food allergies and intolerances
The two are often confused, but while allergies and intolerance can both make you feel bad, effective treatment relies on you knowing the difference.
Zoë Atlas, MPH, RDN
🕗 6 min read
The two are often confused, but while allergies and intolerance can both make you feel bad, effective treatment relies on you knowing the difference.
NutritionAre long-term fasts or water fasts good for you?
Depending on your current health, living without solid food for 24 hours or more may help you burn more fat and trigger helpful adaptations, but it may also trigger muscle loss, and positive effects may not be sustained after several months.
Stephanie Eckelkamp
🕗 10 min read
Are long-term fasts or water fasts good for you?
Inside LevelsMyFitnessPal vs. Levels: Which is the best food tracking app for you?
While MyFitnessPal is one of the original food loggers and sports an extensive database, it’s still best at the basics, while Levels food logging adds an opinion and guidance.
Matigan King
🕗 7 min read
Comparing MyFitnessPal and Levels
NutritionCan you improve cholesterol through diet changes?
While dietary cholesterol isn't as important as once thought, research suggests eating the right fats and carbs can help lower LDL cholesterol levels.
Stephanie Eckelkamp
🕗 9 min read
Can you improve cholesterol through diet changes?
Sign up for the Levels Newsletter